Download Deontic modality by Nate Charlow, Matthew Chrisman PDF

By Nate Charlow, Matthew Chrisman

A rare volume of modern paintings by means of philosophers of language, meta-ethicists, and semanticists has enthusiastic about the which means and serve as of language expressing techniques having to do with what's allowed, forbidden, required, or compulsory, in view of the necessities of morality, the legislations, one's personal tastes or pursuits, or what an expert has commanded: briefly, deontic modality.

This quantity offers new paintings at the much-discussed subject of deontic modality through major figures within the philosophy of language, meta-ethics, and linguistic semantics. The papers take on concerns concerning the position of selection and likelihood conception within the semantics of deontic modality, the viability of normal attainable worlds remedies of the reality stipulations of deontic modal sentences, the potential of dynamic semantic remedies of deontic modality, the technique of semantics for deontic modals, and the clients for representationalist, expressivist, and inferentialist remedies of deontic modality.

Show description

Read Online or Download Deontic modality PDF

Best semantics books

From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations

This ebook is the results of a joint undertaking on lexical and semantic typology which amassed jointly box linguists, semanticists, cognitivists, typologists, and an NLP professional. those cross-linguistic stories difficulty semantic shifts at huge, either synchronic and diachronic: the end result of polysemy, heterosemy, or semantic switch on the lexical point.

Meaning and Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Converging Evidence in Language & Communication Research)

The purpose of this e-book is to provide major facets of cognitive grammar by way of adopting an interdisciplinary procedure. The booklet offers an interaction of contributions by way of a few exponents of cognitive grammar (Langacker, Croft, wooden, Geeraerts, Kövecses, Wildgen), and philosophers of language (Albertazzi, Marconi, Peruzzi, Violi) who, generally, proportion a phenomenological and Gestalt method of the matter of semantics.

The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Bridge Street Accent

This examine offers an illuminating and ground-breaking account of the complicated interplay of intonational phenomena, semantics and pragmatics. in accordance with examples from German and English, and concentrated on an research of the fall-rise intonation contour, a semantic interpretation for 2 varied pitch accents - concentration and subject - is built.

Extra info for Deontic modality

Example text

By moving to elevated priorities we can distinguish between (*) and: (**) {A | given A, it is guaranteed that Joe will be less hungry} (***) {A | A is compatible with Joe’s being less hungry} As we will see, these distinctions play a crucial role in my account. , we can define our indices. Definition  (Indices). An index r is a quadruple r = i, Pr, Alt, o consisting of a set of worlds i, a probability function Pr, a set of alternatives and an elevated ordering source. Notation: Given r, ir , Prr , Altr , or denote the respective parameters in r.

I defer the exploration of these similarities to separate works. 26 Schroeder () argues that ought is ambiguous, and that, at least in one sense, ought should not be understood as denoting a function from propositions to truth-values, but rather as denoting a relation between a subject and an action. The systems I describe here can be easily reformulated to fit Schroeder’s view of the syntactic and semantic category of ought. For the opposing side of the argument, see Chrisman (); Finlay and Snedegar ().

Its job is to determine an ordering of worlds for deontic modalities to quantify over.  Three Unorthodox Ideas My framework deviates from the standard Kratzer framework in three major respects. ). My first deviation is to replace modal bases with fine-grained states. 28 This is an attempt to replicate Kratzer’s idea that conditional antecedents always restrict modals in their consequents, without commitment to Kratzer’s (a) syntactic hypothesis that there are no conditional operators at the level of logical form.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.58 of 5 – based on 20 votes